<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Implementing a cost effective HP Proliant based iSCSI SAN solution over using an HP MSA 1500.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500</link>
	<description>TechHead.co.uk is a site dedicated to information on various IT technologies, solutions, fixes and IT news. Topic areas include HP Proliant Servers &#38; Storage, VMware vSphere,ESX,ESXi, Microsoft Hyper V and Windows Server</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500#comment-6817</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500#comment-6817</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been using Sanmelody here for a year now on HP kit (DL380/MSA70 + 5 ESX hosts). Very robust and great support.

We looked at the 1500 but seemed to be lots of people saying more than 2 hosts would probably overwork the controller. So low cost yes :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been using Sanmelody here for a year now on HP kit (DL380/MSA70 + 5 ESX hosts). Very robust and great support.</p>
<p>We looked at the 1500 but seemed to be lots of people saying more than 2 hosts would probably overwork the controller. So low cost yes <img src='http://www.techhead.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiwi Si</title>
		<link>http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiwi Si</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did an MSA1500 implementation a couple of months back, and I don’t recommend them for a resilient back end storage anyway, vmware only supports single controller arrays see the esx3.5 I/O guide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A controller swap and rescan is required if the active controller fails (the one on the right hand side) and a reboot of all the VM’s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not used datacore before so might take a look at this, cheers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hi Alan

Thanks for this useful information.  It&#039;s great to get real-world feedback on any such gotcha&#039;s or short-comings - this will certainly help others.

Appreciated.

Cheers,

Si</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I did an MSA1500 implementation a couple of months back, and I don’t recommend them for a resilient back end storage anyway, vmware only supports single controller arrays see the esx3.5 I/O guide.</p>
<p>A controller swap and rescan is required if the active controller fails (the one on the right hand side) and a reboot of all the VM’s.</p>
<p>Not used datacore before so might take a look at this, cheers.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hi Alan</p>
<p>Thanks for this useful information.  It&#8217;s great to get real-world feedback on any such gotcha&#8217;s or short-comings &#8211; this will certainly help others.</p>
<p>Appreciated.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Si</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500#comment-6805</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techhead.co.uk/implementing-a-cost-effective-hp-proliant-based-iscsi-san-solution-over-using-an-hp-msa-1500#comment-6805</guid>
		<description>I did an MSA1500 implementation a couple of months back, and I don&#039;t recommend them for a resilient back end storage anyway, vmware only supports single controller arrays see the esx3.5 I/O guide.

A controller swap and rescan is required if the active controller fails (the one on the right hand side) and a reboot of all the VM&#039;s.

Not used datacore before so might take a look at this, cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did an MSA1500 implementation a couple of months back, and I don&#8217;t recommend them for a resilient back end storage anyway, vmware only supports single controller arrays see the esx3.5 I/O guide.</p>
<p>A controller swap and rescan is required if the active controller fails (the one on the right hand side) and a reboot of all the VM&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Not used datacore before so might take a look at this, cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
